UX design architect
D&B Hoovers
Austin, Texas
2011–2012
BI analysts, sales makers, small–medium business owners
AB testing, Omnigraffle, PhotoShop, FireWorks, usability results, user research
AB testing, information architecture, interaction design, visual design, wireframe
Alex is one of the best designers I have ever worked with. When she creates any design, she considers cognitive, perceptual, and physiological psychology factors as well as basic usability and user experience guidelines and realities. It was truly refreshing to work with her because she thinks about users and designs for them so thoroughly and from so many angles in an era when either coding or visual design are so often the only factors considered.
—Jennifer Ehrlich, PhD, UX Lead, Hoovers (Dun & Bradstreet)
Hoover's company fact sheets were online teasers of detailed business intelligence (BI) reports, bringing in sales revenue for the reports, and sales leads for BI subscriptions. Unfortunately, fact sheets were failing at their job. Here is a classic example of UX transforming cluttered, inconsistent design into a profitable feature. Solid AB test results offer yet another blow to the myth that success metrics must drop after any transformative change.
The public D&B Hoovers site was a draw for the paid product, providing a high-level preview of the kind of BI data accessible to paying customers. The free “fact sheet” view of companies not only contained business intelligence, but many calls to action and advertisements.
The business had presented product with some steep goals:
Although Hoover's had standardized fonts and colors, they did not have well-established patterns. After searching for a company, a customer's first view of the fact sheet showed:
More experience and basic usability issues are detailed in the image below. This is the first of six pages submitted as my IA/IxD solution to the product owner. Note that while heuristics are covered, the description's jargon is limited to concepts shared by UX and product.
Please note: While I prefer my designs to be responsive, the fact sheets were overwhelmingly used by customers conducting work on desktop or laptop computers. Hence the strong "above the fold" awareness in the wires below. Responsive was not only not requested but forbidden as a "waste of time." (A hybrid mobile app was eventually developed separately, with a radically different look and feel.)
I performed a UX refresh for the fact sheet, specifically aimed at doing the following:
I do three kinds of wireframes: extremely stripped-down Balsamiq (or Visio, or Omnigraffle); high-res almost-comps (like the ones below); and "live wires," a.k.a. prototypes. It all depends on the situation.
Pure IA, stripped down to black-and-white, is perfect for complex flows, or a UI with many different states according to user permissions or roles. An HTML + CSS + JavaScript prototype can demonstrate the value of an interaction much more quickly. Since much of my solution here would be based in eventual visual design, I chose to demonstrate that to better make my case. Once approved, a visual designer would be assigned to finalize look and feel (see below).
Since the fold line mattered for the vast majority of our users, each view shows where the fold line hits.
Three big changes here:
A/B testing against the original design resulted in not only meeting but exceeding the goals originally set. The newly designed fact sheet page went through multiple percentage tests, up to a 50/50 percent mix with the control. Overall results were outstanding:
Coding and time limitations prevented all recommendations from being implemented, but the heart of the changes were kept, and a key desired improvement was possible (moving the CTA above the advertising column into the main content area). Visual styling of the above wires was performed by the excellent Casey Decker (see below).
I chose Dell as the example company because it was a frequent search by Hoover's users, and because it is such a strong presence in the Austin Silicon Hills. Who knew I would be working there a little over a year later?